Renal tumors (in general)
Pathologic subtypes
- Clear cell RCC (70-80%) - most common primary renal malignancy in adults; from proximal tubule; a/w VHL
- "Clear" nature comes from glycogen/cholesterol being extracted by prep for histology
- Papillary RCC (15%) - more multifocal
- Chromophobe RCC (3-5%) - from collecting duct, a/w BHD
- Oncocytoma (benign) - similar to chromophobe/also from collecting duct; a/w tuberous sclerosis, Birt-Hogg Dube (BHD)
- Collecting duct RCC (< 1%) - aggressive, poor prognosis
- Medullary RCC (rare) - from collecting duct, a/w sickle cell patients, poor prognosis
- Mucinous tubuar and spindle cell (rare) - favorable prognosis
*Sarcomatoid variant can be a/w any subtype - poor prognosis
Risk factors: tobacco, obesity, HTN, familial (hereditary papillary RCC, VHL, BHD, tuberous sclerosis)
Syndrome |
Tumor type |
Associated findings |
Genetics |
VHL |
ccRCC
(can arise from cystic and non-cystic tissue) |
hemangioblastoma (brain/cerebellum, spine, retina) (40-70%), pancreatic cysts/NETs, pheochromocytoma, epididymal/broad ligament cystadenoma, endolymphatic sac tumors of middle ear
- Needs neuro/ophtho followup concomitantly
- Start screening for renal masses age 16
- Follow renal masses < 3 cm with MRI ~q6mo
- Can offer belzutifan (inhibits HIF-2a) FDA approved 2021. Study was for small masses (2 cm) with growth > ~5mm/year. Toxicities include anemia, fatigue
- Nephron sparing approach for masses > 3 cm (higher risk of metastasis)
- Recurrent tumors in 30% of pts at 5 yrs, 80% by 10 yrs
|
chr 3, VHL tumor suppressor loss of function, AD |
BHD |
oncocytoma, chromophobe (or hybrid of 2) |
fibrofolliculomas (cutaneous), pulmonary cysts (spontaneous hemothorax) |
chr 17, BHD encodes folliculin, AD (incomplete penetrance) |
Hereditary papillary RCC |
Type 1 papillary |
multiple, bilateral |
chr 7, c-met oncogene, AD (incomplete penetrance) |
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and papillary RCC |
Type 2 papillary, collecting duct
Aggressive - start screening age 8 (abd MRI), do not surveil |
leiomyomas of uterus and skin |
chr 1, fumarate dehydrogenase (FH), AD |
Tuberous sclerosis |
angiomyolipoma |
lymphangioleiomyomatosis of lung, sugar tumor of lung, pancreas and uterus, other PEComas, cardiac rhabdomyomas, subependymoas and giant cell astrocytomas and retinal hamartomas. |
chr 9, TSC1/2 tumor suppressor, AD |
Succinate dehydrogenase |
Chromophobe, clear cell, type 2 papillary, oncocytoma
Aggressive |
Papillary thryoid carcinoma
Paraganglionomas |
succinate dehydrogenase complex subunits |
Grading: Furhman grading is used for ccRCC and papillary RCC (based on nuclear size/characteristics)
- I-IV, higher grade = worse prognosis
Staging:
Tx |
cannot assess primary tumor |
T0 |
no evidence of primary tumor |
T1* |
Limited to kidney and < 7 cm in greatest dimension |
.T1a |
< 4 cm |
.T1b |
4-7 cm |
T2 |
Limited to kidney and > 7 cm in greatest dimension |
.T2a |
7-10 cm |
.T2b |
> 10 cm |
T3 |
Within Gerota's fascia and no adrenal involvement, but involving major veins or perinephric tissues |
.T3a |
renal vein, microscopic perirenal/renal sinus fat invasion |
.T3b |
vena cava below diaphragm or macroscopic perirenal fat invasion |
.T3c |
vena cava above diaphragm or invades wall of vena cava |
T4 |
Beyond Gerota's fascia or involving ipsilateral adrenal gland |
N1 |
Regional lymph nodes (renal hilar, aortic, interaortocaval, caval) |
M1 |
Distant metastasis |
*20% of T1 masses are benign (oncocytoma, AML); 60% indolent, 20% potentially aggressive
IVC thrombus (occurs in 5-10%)
- Potential surgical cure in 50-70%; not always a/w metastasis. 5 year disease-free survival ~ 65% after surgery.
- Invasion of wall (T3b) is more important prognostic factor than level. MRI can assess invasion with PPV/NPV 90%
- Mayo staging system
- Level I - adjacent to ostium of renal vein
- Level II - up to lower part of liver
- Level III - intrahepatic but below diaphragm
- Level IV - above diaphragm (requires bypass)
- MRI preferred; tumor thrombus will enhance while bland thrombus does not
- Generally put on anticoagulation
- Surgery
- Surgical tips for IVC thrombus
- Get imaging as close as possible to date of surgery (< 2 wks)
- Preop embolization - no clear benefit, unless bulky RP nodes make access to artery
- If chronic IVC collusion - avoid ligating the collaterals (lumbars through hemiazygous) that have developed. In this case don't actually need to reconstruct infrarenal IVC if taken.
- Now > 60% are found incidentally
- Classic 'triad' - hematuria, flank pain, abdominal mass - is rare now
- 15% present with locally advanced/metastatic RCC
- Can present with spontaneous perirenal hemorrhage, which may obscure underlying mass. Follow with CT a few months later - 50% of spontaneous bleeds have an occult renal tumor (AML/RCC)
Natural history
- Metastasizes hematogenously + lymphatically to lung and bone (spine). 20% of patients present with metastatic disease.
- Paraneoplastic syndromes of note:
- Hypertension (40%) - renin production, or encasement of renal artery
- Anemia (36%)
- Cachexia, weight loss, fever (15-35%)
- Stauffer's (15%) - abnormal LFTs, but not necessarily due to liver invasion/emts
- Hypercalcemia (5%) - PTHrP or lytic bone lesions
- Polycythemia (↑ erythropoietin)
- In general - 5-year cancer specific survival for T1a renal masses is > 95%. For other stages:
- T1b - 80-90%
- T2 - 50-80%
- T3b/c (IVC thrombus) - 20-50%
- Metastatic - 0-10% pre-checkpoint era, now maybe ~ 25%?
- CBC, CMP, UA
- Abdominal imaging - CT/MR pre/post contrast
- Iodinated contrast - pre-hydrate with NS if GFR < 30; consider prehydration if GFR 30-45
- Gadolinium - OK to give for GFR < 30; lower risk of NSF than previously thought
- In general - RCC enhances > 15-20 HU, does not have fat
- Chest imaging - CXR, or CT chest if thought to be high risk or has abnormal CXR
- Bone scan - only if bone pain or elevated alk phos
- Brain imaging - only if neurologic sx
- Renal mass biopsy - if suspect metastatic disease, inflammatory, infectious, or hematologic (e.g. lymphoma). Otherwise low utility.
- Genetic testing if: age < 46, bilateral multifocal disease, or family history of kidney cancer.
- Nephrology referral - if expect GFR < 30 postop; if DM with CKD. Can get Mag3 scan to predict expected GFR
Renal tumors (in general)
Localized disease
Surveillance
- Reasonable for solid masses < 2 cm or predominantly cystic mass, or if limited life expectancy/don't want surgery
- Should treat if ≥ 3 cm, growing > 0.3 cm/year, symptoms, or biopsy shows high-grade cancer
- Repeat imaging in 3-6 mo
Ablation: for cT1a < 3 cm. Radio or cryoablation. Slightly worse outcomes wrt local recurrence.
Radical nephrectomy (RN): removal of Gerota's fascia (containing kidney and perirenal fat)
- Remove adrenal if: upper pole tumor > 7 cm, tumor thrombus involving, imaging/intraoperative suspicion of adrenal involvement. Adrenal insufficiency rare if contralateral adrenal is OK
- Regional lymph node dissection: only if there is clinically concerning lymphadenopathy. Does not improve cure/survival for T1-T3N0M0; maybe for N1.
- L - para-aortic + interaortocaval; R - paracaval + interaortocaval. Template: from diaphragm crus to common iliac.
- Adjuvant therapy for high risk of recurrence: Many negative studies pre-IO, but FDA approved for
- Stage II (T2N0) Gr 4 clear cell +/- sarcomatoid - pembrolizumab
- Stage III (T3 or N1) clear cell - pembro (or sunitinib - less evidence)
- KEYNOTE-564 (pembro, 2021) positive study (disease-free survival 77% vs 68% at 24 mo), but atezo and nivo were negative studies
- ASSURE nomogram for cancer-free survival
Nephron sparing (NSS): Partial nx, enucleation, or ablation; less hit to GFR. Use if renal mass ≤ 7 cm (eg T1, similar cure rate as RN), or need to preserve more kidney function (solitary, poor renal function, b/l tumors).
- Local recurrence after PNx for small renal masses in < 2%
- Consider ablation (thermal, radio, cryo) for solid masses < 3 cm.
- Should do biopsy prior to (preferred) or during ablation for pathologic confirmation.
- Should get pre/post contrast imaging within 6 mo after ablation (5-10% failure rate for ablation)
If GFR < 45 or expected to be < 30 after intervention, consider referral to nephrology
- EORTC 30904 - PNx reduces incidence of moderate renal dysfunction (GFR < 60), but PNx/RNx equivalent incidence of severe dysfunction (GFR < 30, GFR < 15)
- PNx on solitary kidney - 5-15% required temporary dialysis, 5% required permanent dialysis
Follow-up after nephrectomy:
- If microscopic margins positive, increase risk by one level
- Follow-up intervals (in months) below based on risk
- H&P
- Abdominal imaging (CT or MR, pre+post contrast). Can switch to US after 5 years or after 2 years in LR/IR groups
- Chest imaging (CXR (LR/IR) or CT chest (HR/VHR)). Can switch to CXR after 5 years for HR/VHR groups.
- 30% of recurrences are diagnosed after 5 years. After 5 years, informed/shared decision-making should dictate further abdominal imaging. (Previous guidelines stopped surveillance after 3-5 years).
- *? Partial nephrectomy only - yearly imaging (US/CT/MRI) for 3 years
|
Recurrence rate |
3 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
18 |
24 |
30 |
36 |
48 |
60 |
72-84 |
96-120 |
Low risk (LR)
pT1 Gr 1/2 |
6-15% |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
Intermediate risk (IR)
pT1 Gr 3/4, or pT2 (> 7 cm)
|
20-30%
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
High risk (HR)
pT3 (renal vein or fat invasion)
|
50%
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Very high risk (VHR)
pT4 or pN1, or macroscopic positive margin, or sarcomatoid or rhabdoid dedifferentiation
|
65%-75%
pN1: median cancer specific survival of 3 years
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Advanced disease
Systemic therapy
- Mainstay is immunotherapy + checkpoint inhibitors - chemo generally ineffective
- Risk stratification for advanced disease: IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium)
- Risk factors: Karnofsky performance status < 80%, time from diagnosis to treatment < 1 year, Hgb < LLN (12), calcium > ULN, ANC > ULN, platelets > ULN, LDH > 1.5x ULN (MSKCC)
- 0 risk factors - favorable risk (44mo survival)
- Limited disease burden
- Can consider close active surveillance
- Single-agent anti-angiogenic (sunitinib or pazopanib)
- Single-agent immunotherapy (pembro or nivo)
- Substantial disease burden - immuno + anti-angiogenic, or combo immuno
- Nivolumab + ipilimumab
- Pembro + axitinib
- Nivolumab + cabozantinib
- 1-2 risk factors - intermediate risk (27mo survival), ≥ 3 risk factors - poor risk (9mo survival)
- Symptomatic or life threatening disease - lenvatinib + pembro, or nivolumab + cabozantinib
- Otherwise - above options plus nivolumab + ipilimumab, pembro + axitinib
- 1st line poor performance: temsirolimus
Classes of therapies
- PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab (2015))
- PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab)
- Anti CTLA-4 antibody (ipilimumab)
- mTOR inhibitor (tumor cell growth/survival inhibitors) (everolimus (2008), temsirolimus (2007) for non-ccRCC)
- Decreases VEGF (angiogenesis), HIF (cell proliferation)
- VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (axitinib, sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, bevacizumab)
- Toxicity: HTN, impaired wound healing, GI perforation, hand/foot/mouth mucositis
- Soarafenib, sunitinib (2005-2006)
- Pazopanib - same response as sunitinib; less side effects
- Cabozantinib - superior survival to sunitinib (46% response vs 18%)
- Bevacizumab - stop bevacizumab 28 days before/after surgery for wound healing.
- Nivolumab + ipilimumab
- FDA approved (2020) for first line for intermediate/poor risk, used off label for favorable risk
- Checkmate 214 trial: nivo/ipi vs sunitinib. Intermediate/poor risk - complete response 9% vs 1% (~40% of these had durable response). 5-year OS 43% vs 31%, 5-year PFS 31% vs 11%. (for favorable risk - similar OS, lower PFS, higher CR).
- Pembro + axitinib
- FDA approved (2019) for first line treatment regardless of risk
- KEYNOTE-426 trial: pembro/axi vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 9% vs 3%. 2-year OS 74% vs 65%, 2-year PFS 38% vs 27%.
- Nivolumab + cabozantinib
- FDA approved (2021) for first line treatment regardless of risk
- CheckMate 9ER trial: nivo/cabo vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 12% vs 5%. 2-year OS 70% vs 60%, 2-year PFS 40% vs 21%.
- Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab
- FDA approved (2021) for first line treatment regardless of risk
- CLEAR trial: nivo/cabo vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 16% vs 4%. Improved OS, PFS 24mo vs 9mo
- Avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib - improved PFS but not OS
- Second line therapy - depends on how long first agent worked and what they had before
- If failed TKI - can try another TKI or IO. Cabozantinib superior to everolimus (METEOR trial)
- If failed IO - use a TKI
- General principles
- Tumor may look larger initially due to infiltration of T cells - wait 3 mo for first scan; may take 6 mo to start shrinking
- Can have flares of autoimmune conditions (eg mostly anything besides autoimmune thyroiditis)
- Older agents
- High dose IL-2 (durable remission for ccRCC in only 3-5%) - stimulates cell-mediated immunity. Very toxic (vascular leak, syndrome, renal failure, arrhythmias)/high mortality (1990s). Need to have high performance status; not used much anymore
- Interferon alpha - no longer manufactured
Metastatectomy
- Solitary metastasis or oligometastasis: resect if can render disease free with resection.
- Lung metastasis has better prognosis than other locations.
- 44% 5-year survival for complete metastectomy vs 10-15% if not
- Bone met > 3cm in weight-bearing bone - ortho surgery before systemic therapy
Cytoreductive nephrectomy
- Intermediate/poor-risk patients: should do upfront systemic therapy.
- If complete reponse, -> cytoreductive nephrectomy
- If stable or partial response, can consider cytoreductive nephrectomy
- Progression -> no nephrectomy
- Poor risk or worsened performance status -> no nephrectomy
- Data
- Interferon era - data supported cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to IFN/IL-2, but these are no longer used
- TKI/Anti-angiogenic era
- CARMENA trial showed upfront nephrectomy + sunitinib not superior to sunitinib alone (however trial included many poor risk patients)
- IO/Checkpoint inhibitor era - no prospective data yet, but SWOG 1931/PROBE trial underway to study IO followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy (if stable or partial reponse to IO) vs IO alone
- Delayed nephrectomy benefits - SURTIME trial - deferred nx improved OS by 17.4 mo compared to immediate nx.
- Antigen load may help IO work better, and can identify those who wouldn't benefit from nephrectomy (disease progression on IO)
- Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy more likely to benefit: good performance status, lung-only metastases
author:
admin |
last edited: Sept. 23, 2024, 1:29 p.m. | pk: 7
Pocket urology - page 21
- AUA guidelines - renal mass and localized renal cancer
- EAU guidelines - renal cell carcinoma