Renal tumors (in general)

Pathologic subtypes

  • Clear cell RCC (70-80%) - most common primary renal malignancy in adults; from proximal tubule; a/w VHL
    • "Clear" nature comes from glycogen/cholesterol being extracted by prep for histology
  • Papillary RCC (15%) - more multifocal
  • Chromophobe RCC (3-5%) - from collecting duct, a/w BHD
    • Oncocytoma (benign) - similar to chromophobe/also from collecting duct; a/w tuberous sclerosis, Birt-Hogg Dube (BHD)
  • Collecting duct RCC (< 1%) - aggressive, poor prognosis
  • Medullary RCC (rare) - from collecting duct, a/w sickle cell patients, poor prognosis
  • Mucinous tubuar and spindle cell (rare) - favorable prognosis

*Sarcomatoid variant can be a/w any subtype - poor prognosis

Risk factors: tobacco, obesity, HTN, familial (hereditary papillary RCC, VHL, BHD, tuberous sclerosis)

Syndrome Tumor type Associated findings Genetics
VHL ccRCC
(can arise from cystic and non-cystic tissue)

hemangioblastoma (brain/cerebellum, spine, retina) (40-70%), pancreatic cysts/NETs, pheochromocytoma, epididymal/broad ligament cystadenoma, endolymphatic sac tumors of middle ear

  • Needs neuro/ophtho followup concomitantly
  • Start screening for renal masses age 16
  • Follow renal masses < 3 cm with MRI ~q6mo
    • Can offer belzutifan (inhibits HIF-2a) FDA approved 2021. Study was for small masses (2 cm) with growth > ~5mm/year. Toxicities include anemia, fatigue
  • Nephron sparing approach for masses > 3 cm (higher risk of metastasis)
  • Recurrent tumors in 30% of pts at 5 yrs, 80% by 10 yrs
chr 3, VHL tumor suppressor loss of function, AD
BHD oncocytoma, chromophobe (or hybrid of 2) fibrofolliculomas (cutaneous), pulmonary cysts (spontaneous hemothorax) chr 17, BHD encodes folliculin, AD (incomplete penetrance)
Hereditary papillary RCC Type 1 papillary  multiple, bilateral chr 7, c-met oncogene, AD (incomplete penetrance)
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and papillary RCC Type 2 papillary, collecting duct 
Aggressive - start screening age 8 (abd MRI), do not surveil
leiomyomas of uterus and skin chr 1, fumarate dehydrogenase (FH), AD
Tuberous sclerosis angiomyolipoma lymphangioleiomyomatosis of lung, sugar tumor of lung, pancreas and uterus, other PEComas, cardiac rhabdomyomas, subependymoas and giant cell astrocytomas and retinal hamartomas. chr 9, TSC1/2 tumor suppressor, AD
Succinate dehydrogenase Chromophobe, clear cell, type 2 papillary, oncocytoma
Aggressive
Papillary thryoid carcinoma
Paraganglionomas
succinate dehydrogenase complex subunits

Grading: Furhman grading is used for ccRCC and papillary RCC (based on nuclear size/characteristics)

  • I-IV, higher grade = worse prognosis 

Staging:

Tx cannot assess primary tumor
T0 no evidence of primary tumor
T1* Limited to kidney and < 7 cm in greatest dimension
.T1a < 4 cm
.T1b 4-7 cm
T2 Limited to kidney and > 7 cm in greatest dimension
.T2a 7-10 cm
.T2b > 10 cm
T3 Within Gerota's fascia and no adrenal involvement, but involving major veins or perinephric tissues
.T3a renal vein, microscopic perirenal/renal sinus fat invasion
.T3b vena cava below diaphragm or macroscopic perirenal fat invasion
.T3c vena cava above diaphragm or invades wall of vena cava
T4 Beyond Gerota's fascia or involving ipsilateral adrenal gland
N1 Regional lymph nodes (renal hilar, aortic, interaortocaval, caval)
M1 Distant metastasis

*20% of T1 masses are benign (oncocytoma, AML); 60% indolent, 20% potentially aggressive

IVC thrombus (occurs in 5-10%)

  • Potential surgical cure in 50-70%; not always a/w metastasis. 5 year disease-free survival ~ 65% after surgery.
  • Invasion of wall (T3b) is more important prognostic factor than level. MRI can assess invasion with PPV/NPV 90%
  • Mayo staging system
    • Level I - adjacent to ostium of renal vein
    • Level II - up to lower part of liver
    • Level III - intrahepatic but below diaphragm
    • Level IV - above diaphragm (requires bypass)
  • MRI preferred; tumor thrombus will enhance while bland thrombus does not
  • Generally put on anticoagulation
  • Surgery
    • Surgical tips for IVC thrombus
    • Get imaging as close as possible to date of surgery (< 2 wks)
    • Preop embolization - no clear benefit, unless bulky RP nodes make access to artery
    • If chronic IVC collusion - avoid ligating the collaterals (lumbars through hemiazygous) that have developed. In this case don't actually need to reconstruct infrarenal IVC if taken.

Hepatic venous circulation: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia Image

  • Now > 60% are found incidentally
    • Classic 'triad' - hematuria, flank pain, abdominal mass - is rare now
  • 15% present with locally advanced/metastatic RCC
  • Can present with spontaneous perirenal hemorrhage, which may obscure underlying mass. Follow with CT a few months later - 50% of spontaneous bleeds have an occult renal tumor (AML/RCC)

Natural history

  • Metastasizes hematogenously + lymphatically to lung and bone (spine). 20% of patients present with metastatic disease.
  • Paraneoplastic syndromes of note:
    • Hypertension (40%) - renin production, or encasement of renal artery
    • Anemia (36%)
    • Cachexia, weight loss, fever (15-35%)
    • Stauffer's (15%) - abnormal LFTs, but not necessarily due to liver invasion/emts
    • Hypercalcemia (5%) - PTHrP or lytic bone lesions
    • Polycythemia (↑ erythropoietin)
  • In general - 5-year cancer specific survival for T1a renal masses is > 95%. For other stages:
    • T1b - 80-90%
    • T2 - 50-80%
    • T3b/c (IVC thrombus) - 20-50%
    • Metastatic - 0-10% pre-checkpoint era, now maybe ~ 25%?
  • CBC, CMP, UA
  • Abdominal imaging - CT/MR pre/post contrast
    • Iodinated contrast - pre-hydrate with NS if GFR < 30; consider prehydration if GFR 30-45
    • Gadolinium - OK to give for GFR < 30; lower risk of NSF than previously thought
    • In general - RCC enhances > 15-20 HU, does not have fat
  • Chest imaging - CXR, or CT chest if thought to be high risk or has abnormal CXR
  • Bone scan - only if bone pain or elevated alk phos
  • Brain imaging - only if neurologic sx
  • Renal mass biopsy - if suspect metastatic disease, inflammatory, infectious, or hematologic (e.g. lymphoma). Otherwise low utility.
  • Genetic testing if: age < 46, bilateral multifocal disease, or family history of kidney cancer.
  • Nephrology referral - if expect GFR < 30 postop; if DM with CKD. Can get Mag3 scan to predict expected GFR

Renal tumors (in general)

Localized disease

Surveillance 

  • Reasonable for solid masses < 2 cm or predominantly cystic mass, or if limited life expectancy/don't want surgery
  • Should treat if ≥ 3 cm, growing > 0.3 cm/year, symptoms, or biopsy shows high-grade cancer
  • Repeat imaging in 3-6 mo

Ablation: for cT1a < 3 cm. Radio or cryoablation. Slightly worse outcomes wrt local recurrence.

Radical nephrectomy (RN): removal of Gerota's fascia (containing kidney and perirenal fat)

  • Remove adrenal if: upper pole tumor > 7 cm, tumor thrombus involving, imaging/intraoperative suspicion of adrenal involvement. Adrenal insufficiency rare if contralateral adrenal is OK
  • Regional lymph node dissection: only if there is clinically concerning lymphadenopathy. Does not improve cure/survival for T1-T3N0M0; maybe for N1.
    • L - para-aortic + interaortocaval; R - paracaval + interaortocaval. Template: from diaphragm crus to common iliac.
  • Adjuvant therapy for high risk of recurrence: Many negative studies pre-IO, but FDA approved for
    • Stage II (T2N0) Gr 4 clear cell +/- sarcomatoid - pembrolizumab
    • Stage III (T3 or N1) clear cell - pembro (or sunitinib - less evidence)
    • KEYNOTE-564 (pembro, 2021) positive study (disease-free survival 77% vs 68% at 24 mo), but atezo and nivo were negative studies 
    • ASSURE nomogram for cancer-free survival

Nephron sparing (NSS): Partial nx, enucleation, or ablation; less hit to GFR. Use if renal mass ≤ 7 cm (eg T1, similar cure rate as RN), or need to preserve more kidney function (solitary, poor renal function, b/l tumors).

  • Local recurrence after PNx for small renal masses in < 2%
  • Consider ablation (thermal, radio, cryo) for solid masses < 3 cm.
    • Should do biopsy prior to (preferred) or during ablation for pathologic confirmation.
    • Should get pre/post contrast imaging within 6 mo after ablation (5-10% failure rate for ablation)

If GFR < 45 or expected to be < 30 after intervention, consider referral to nephrology

  • EORTC 30904 - PNx reduces incidence of moderate renal dysfunction (GFR < 60), but PNx/RNx equivalent incidence of severe dysfunction (GFR < 30, GFR < 15)
  • PNx on solitary kidney - 5-15% required temporary dialysis, 5% required permanent dialysis

Follow-up after nephrectomy:

  • If microscopic margins positive, increase risk by one level
  • Follow-up intervals (in months) below based on risk
    • H&P
    • Abdominal imaging (CT or MR, pre+post contrast). Can switch to US after 5 years or after 2 years in LR/IR groups
    • Chest imaging (CXR (LR/IR) or CT chest (HR/VHR)). Can switch to CXR after 5 years for HR/VHR groups.
  • 30% of recurrences are diagnosed after 5 years. After 5 years, informed/shared decision-making should dictate further abdominal imaging. (Previous guidelines stopped surveillance after 3-5 years).
  • *? Partial nephrectomy only - yearly imaging (US/CT/MRI) for 3 years
  Recurrence rate  3 6 9 12 18 24 30 36 48 60 72-84 96-120
Low risk (LR)
pT1 Gr 1/2
6-15%       x   x     x x x x

Intermediate risk (IR)
pT1 Gr 3/4, or pT2 (> 7 cm)

20-30%

  x   x   x   x x x x x

High risk (HR)
pT3 (renal vein or fat invasion)

50%

  x   x x x x x x x x x

Very high risk (VHR)
pT4 or pN1, or macroscopic positive margin, or sarcomatoid or rhabdoid dedifferentiation

65%-75%
pN1: median cancer specific survival of 3 years

x x x x x x x x x x x x

 

Advanced disease

Systemic therapy

  • Mainstay is immunotherapy + checkpoint inhibitors - chemo generally ineffective
  • Risk stratification for advanced disease: IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium)
    • Risk factors: Karnofsky performance status < 80%, time from diagnosis to treatment < 1 year, Hgb < LLN (12), calcium > ULN, ANC > ULN, platelets > ULN, LDH > 1.5x ULN (MSKCC)
    • 0 risk factors - favorable risk (44mo survival)
      • Limited disease burden
        • Can consider close active surveillance
        • Single-agent anti-angiogenic (sunitinib or pazopanib)
        • Single-agent immunotherapy (pembro or nivo)
      • Substantial disease burden - immuno + anti-angiogenic, or combo immuno
        • Nivolumab + ipilimumab
        • Pembro + axitinib
        • Nivolumab + cabozantinib
    • 1-2 risk factors - intermediate risk (27mo survival), ≥ 3 risk factors - poor risk  (9mo survival)
      • Symptomatic or life threatening disease - lenvatinib + pembro, or nivolumab + cabozantinib
      • Otherwise - above options plus nivolumab + ipilimumab, pembro + axitinib
    • 1st line poor performance: temsirolimus

Classes of therapies

  • PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab (2015))
  • PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab)
  • Anti CTLA-4 antibody (ipilimumab)
  • mTOR inhibitor (tumor cell growth/survival inhibitors) (everolimus (2008), temsirolimus (2007) for non-ccRCC)
    • Decreases VEGF (angiogenesis), HIF (cell proliferation)
  • VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (axitinib, sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, bevacizumab)
    • Toxicity: HTN, impaired wound healing, GI perforation, hand/foot/mouth mucositis
    • Soarafenib, sunitinib (2005-2006)
    • Pazopanib - same response as sunitinib; less side effects
    • Cabozantinib - superior survival to sunitinib (46% response vs 18%)
    • Bevacizumab - stop bevacizumab 28 days before/after surgery for wound healing.
  • Nivolumab + ipilimumab
    • FDA approved (2020) for first line for intermediate/poor risk, used off label for favorable risk
    • Checkmate 214 trial: nivo/ipi vs sunitinib. Intermediate/poor risk - complete response 9% vs 1% (~40% of these had durable response). 5-year OS 43% vs 31%, 5-year PFS 31% vs 11%. (for favorable risk - similar OS, lower PFS, higher CR).
  • Pembro + axitinib
    • FDA approved (2019) for first line treatment regardless of risk
    • KEYNOTE-426 trial: pembro/axi vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 9% vs 3%. 2-year OS 74% vs 65%, 2-year PFS 38% vs 27%. 
  • Nivolumab + cabozantinib
    • FDA approved (2021) for first line treatment regardless of risk
    • CheckMate 9ER trial: nivo/cabo vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 12% vs 5%. 2-year OS 70% vs 60%, 2-year PFS 40% vs 21%. 
  • Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab
    • FDA approved (2021) for first line treatment regardless of risk
    • CLEAR trial: nivo/cabo vs sunitinib. Entire cohort: complete response 16% vs 4%. Improved OS, PFS 24mo vs 9mo
  • Avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib - improved PFS but not OS
  • Second line therapy - depends on how long first agent worked and what they had before
    • If failed TKI - can try another TKI or IO. Cabozantinib superior to everolimus (METEOR trial)
    • If failed IO - use a TKI
  • General principles
    • Tumor may look larger initially due to infiltration of T cells - wait 3 mo for first scan; may take 6 mo to start shrinking
    • Can have flares of autoimmune conditions (eg mostly anything besides autoimmune thyroiditis)
  • Older agents
    • High dose IL-2 (durable remission for ccRCC in only 3-5%) - stimulates cell-mediated immunity. Very toxic (vascular leak, syndrome, renal failure, arrhythmias)/high mortality (1990s). Need to have high performance status; not used much anymore
    • Interferon alpha - no longer manufactured

Metastatectomy

  • Solitary metastasis or oligometastasis: resect if can render disease free with resection.
    • Lung metastasis has better prognosis than other locations.
    • 44% 5-year survival for complete metastectomy vs 10-15% if not
  • Bone met > 3cm in weight-bearing bone - ortho surgery before systemic therapy

Cytoreductive nephrectomy

  • Intermediate/poor-risk patients: should do upfront systemic therapy.
    • If complete reponse, -> cytoreductive nephrectomy
    • If stable or partial response, can consider cytoreductive nephrectomy
    • Progression -> no nephrectomy
    • Poor risk or worsened performance status -> no nephrectomy
  • Data
    • Interferon era - data supported cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to IFN/IL-2, but these are no longer used
    • TKI/Anti-angiogenic era
      • CARMENA trial showed upfront nephrectomy + sunitinib not superior to sunitinib alone (however trial included many poor risk patients)
    • IO/Checkpoint inhibitor era - no prospective data yet, but SWOG 1931/PROBE trial underway to study IO followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy (if stable or partial reponse to IO) vs IO alone
    • Delayed nephrectomy benefits - SURTIME trial - deferred nx improved OS by 17.4 mo compared to immediate nx.
      • Antigen load may help IO work better, and can identify those who wouldn't benefit from nephrectomy (disease progression on IO)
    • Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy more likely to benefit: good performance status, lung-only metastases
author: admin | last edited: Sept. 23, 2024, 1:29 p.m. | pk: 7

Pocket urology - page 21

  1. AUA guidelines - renal mass and localized renal cancer 
  2. EAU guidelines - renal cell carcinoma