Radiographic appearance

  • Simple cyst (< 20 HU on noncon) - benign
  • Complex cyst - use Bosniak criteria
    • Hemorrhagic/hyperdense cyst
    • Cystic RCC
    • Cystic nephroma, mixed epithelial-stromal tumor (MEST) - benign behavior, but radiographically indistinguishable from cystic RCC (or from cystic Wilms in children). Manage with nephron sparing if able in adults. Female predominance.
  • Enhancing solid renal mass (> 15 HU subtraction)
    • RCC until proven otherwise
    • Angiomyolipoma (< 10% of renal tumors)
      • Benign
      • A/w tuberous sclerosis (60% of TSc have AML) but only 20% of AML have TSc
        • TSc AMLs (and multifocal AMLs) grow faster - 20%/year vs 5%/year)
      • Can be diagnosed with just imaging (CT/MRI) - HU < -20 = fat; PPV nearing 100%
        • Confusing situations: retroperitoneal liposarcoma; RCC with fat; fat-poor AML (5%; up to 30% in TS)
        • Calcifications rarely a/w AML; likely RCC
      • Usually asymptomatic
      • < 4 cm: surveillance
      • ≥ 4 cm: treat due to increased risk of hemorrhage (Wunderlich syndrome)
        • Selective embolization
          • Preferred if acutely hemorrhaging - surgery in this setting often leads to total nephrectomy
        • Excision (nephron sparing)
        • Ablation - under evaluation
    • Oncocytoma (3-7% of renal tumors)
      • Benign
      • Mahogany/tan grossly; pseudotumor with central stellate scar
      • Histologically similar to chromophobe RCC/eosinophilic RCC (both derived from distal renal tubules)
  • Moderately enhancing solid mass
    • Papillary/chromophobe RCC, fat poor AML, sarcoma

Pediatric renal masses

Biopsy

  • Non-diagnostic in about 15%
  • Overall accuracy ~ 80%
  • Complications (pneumothorax, significant perinephric bleeding) < 1%
  • RCC unlikely to have needle track seeding - but poorly differentiated upper tract UC can; avoid in infiltrative central masses.
  • Don't sample cystic masses - high sampling error; risk of tumor cell spillage

Imaging of renal masses

  • US - cheap and no radiation, but operator dependent and low sensitivity for detecting solid masses < 3.5 cm. Helpful for simple cysts; unclear about cystic masses.
    • Follow morphology of cystic mass, not size
    • If not a simple cyst - get CT to follow up
  • CT renal mass protocol - mainstay
    • Precontrast (to see if a mass is enhancing)
    • Corticomedullary - can help with arterial anatomy, subtyping RCC (hypervascular = ccRCC, hypovascular = papillary)
    • Nephrographic
    • Excretory (about 5-10 min post injection) - ddx urothelial carcinoma, renal sinus cyst, calyceal diverticulum
    • Enhancement = > 15 HU difference from precontrast. 
  • MRI renal mass protocol - problem solving
    • T2W with (fat dark) and without fat sat (fat bright) - fluid sensitive, CSF bright
      • Black on T2 - hemosiderin/hemorrhagic 
    • T1W with fat sat - most similar to CT
      • Precontrast - water only (LAVA flex or Vibe) (kidneys bright, fat dark)
      • In phase - kidneys dark, water and fat look bright together
      • Out of phase - kidneys dark, fat/water cancel (intracellular fat, water-fat interface is dark - India ink artifact). Only microscopic fat drops in out of phase (eg lipid poor AML, or microscopic fat = ccRCC)
      • T1 fat only - kidneys black, fat bright - to look for macroscopic fat
      • Dynamic postcontrast
    • Subtractions - postcon T1W - Precon T1W = see only enhancement
      • Enhancement = increase in 15% signal intensity between precontrast and nephrographic phase
    • ccRCC - hypervascular, bright on inphase, dark on out of phase
    • AML - bright on inphase, bright on out of phase (macroscopic fat)
Mass Imaging characteristics
RCC Heterogeneous
Type I papillary Very homogeneous, minimally enhancing
Angiomyolipoma (AML) CT HU < -20 = fat; PPV nearing 100%
MR - high T1 signal (fat); loss of signal on T2 fat suppression
(5% fat-poor; up to 30% fat-poor in TS)
Oncocytoma Central scar
   

Imaging of a cystic mass

  • CT
    • HU < 20 (non-con) = simple cyst
    • HU > 60 (non-con) and homogeneous = most likely hemorrhaghic cyst
    • Heterogeneous = work it up, even if HU < 20. If suspicious, get US - if simple on US, then is hemorrhagic cyst. If not simple on US, get renal mass protocol CT/MRI

Bosniak criteria

  • Updated 2019 to emphasize specificity rather than sensitivity
  • Based on CT findings
  • MR tends to make septa appear thicker (larger voxels) so more likely to upgrade lesion
Bosniak class
(risk of malignancy)
Criteria
  Septa Enhancement
I - simple cyst
(0%)
-> no further evaluation
None None
II* - minimally complex
(0%)
-> no further evaluation

few, hairline thin < 1 mm

thin calcifications (not measurable)

Perceived but not measurable

IIF* - minimally complex
(5%)
-> follow up, no strict rules but US/CT/MRI at 6 mo reasonable, document stability annually x 5 years

Multiple, hairline thin or minimally thickened

Thick, nodular calcifications

Perceived but not measurable

III - indeterminate
(55%)
-> consider surgery

Thick, nodular, multiple Yes

IV - clearly malignant
(100%)
-> surgery

Solid mass with cystic or necrotic component Yes
  • Bosniak II also includes: Non-enhancing high attenuation lesion < 3 cm in diameter (eg hemorrhagic or proteinaceous cyst)
  • Bosniak IIF also includes: Non-enhancing, hyperdense cyst > 3 cm diameter, mostly intrarenal (< 25% of wall visible)
author: admin | last edited: June 4, 2024, 12:59 p.m. | pk: 63